Re: OT - SP and ATM

From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 13:37:28 ART

Next message: sheherezada@gmail.com: "Re: OT - SP and ATM"
Previous message: postmaster@mcrmc.org: "Spam: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
Maybe in reply to: Gary Duncanson: "OT - SP and ATM"
Next in thread: sheherezada@gmail.com: "Re: OT - SP and ATM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Believe it or not, Cisco has removed the ATM portion from their MPLS course,
and i assume, the SP track will be updated pretty soon. Its not used as
often.

On 12/6/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gary,
> MPLS without ATM can get boring ;-) Even though Gigabit Ethernet has
> taken off, some SP networks are still using ATM switches and running MPLS
> over them. MPLS certification would be incomplete with ATM.
>
> HTH,
> Tarun
>
>
> On 12/6/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > Is ATM covered in CCIE SP? I was wondering if an ATM switch would be
> > useful
> > for a home lab and suitable specs.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
CCSI# 30832
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
www.Net-WorkBooks.com

Next message: sheherezada@gmail.com: "Re: OT - SP and ATM"
Previous message: postmaster@mcrmc.org: "Spam: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
Maybe in reply to: Gary Duncanson: "OT - SP and ATM"
Next in thread: sheherezada@gmail.com: "Re: OT - SP and ATM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST