From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 11:01:36 ART
Jason,
You want to give up so soon? Ok, Let me give you a hint.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/9.html#q13
HTH,
Tarun
On 12/6/07, Smith, Jason <JASmith@nuvox.com> wrote:
>
> It is OSPF and the routers are in area 0. I don't think it can be done J
>
>
>
> *From:* Tarun Pahuja [mailto:pahujat@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:12 PM
> *To:* Smith, Jason
> *Cc:* Gupta, Gopal (NWCC); Carlos Trujillo Jimenez; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: OSPF Route Maniputation
>
>
>
> Smith,
>
> What routing protocol are you using? If ospf, are the routers
> in question in the same area?
>
>
>
> Tarun
>
>
>
> On 12/5/07, *Smith, Jason* <JASmith@nuvox.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, so that idea is out, thanks for checking that. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason Smith
>
> CCIE #12097
>
> NuVox Communications
>
> Work 864-331-7716
>
> Cell 864-561-7172
>
>
>
> From: Gupta, Gopal (NWCC) [mailto:gopal.gupta@hp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:35 AM
> To: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez; Smith, Jason; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF Route Maniputation
>
>
>
> It is not going to work because when router changes the AD it can be
> changed on specific routes for the neighbor who originated it.
> So when Router D recieves routes it changes the AD for that Route but
> for both of the equal cost path Routes and not for a single path coz
> both have been originated by same Router.
>
> I have labbed it can show you..
>
>
> Config
>
> Router-D# sh run | sec ospf
> router ospf 1
> router-id 3.3.3.3
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 155.1.13.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 155.1.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 155.1.34.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> distance 111 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 1
>
>
> Router-D #sh ip ro os
> 155.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> O 155.1.24.0 [110/128] via 155.1.34.4, 00:06:25, Serial1/0.23
> O 155.1.0.0 [110/128] via 155.1.13.1, 00:06:25, Serial1/0.13
> 150.1.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O 150.1.1.1 [111/129] via 155.1.34.4 , 00:06:25, Serial1/0.23
> [111/129] via 155.1.13.1, 00:06:25,
> Serial1/0.13
> 150.2.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O 150.2.2.2 [110/129] via 155.1.34.4, 00:06:25, Serial1/0.23
> [110/129] via 155.1.13.1, 00:06:25, Serial1/0.13
>
>
>
> HTH
>
> Gops
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On Behalf Of
> Carlos Trujillo Jimenez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 21:19
> To: JASmith@nuvox.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: OSPF Route Maniputation
> Importance: Low
>
> you can change the administrative distance of the "prefered" or selected
> routes per neighbor, you select the routes where you want to change to a
> value less than the default with an acl, then you select the neighbor
> router who is sending you routes via the prefered path and change the
> distance of only the selected route from the acl. thus you can
> manipulate the path to certaing given routes over a prefered path.
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Smith, Jason" <JASmith@nuvox.com>
> >Reply-To: "Smith, Jason" <JASmith@nuvox.com >
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: OSPF Route Maniputation
> >Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:01:55 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
> >bay0-mc10-f7.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC( 6.0.3790.2668);
> >Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:12:50 -0800
> >Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com
> >(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id lB5FCcHo025476;Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:12:38
> >-0500
> >Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
> > lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
> >lB5F1qEG025243for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2007
> >10:01:53 -0500
> >Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
> >groupstudy.com
> >(8.12.11.20060308 /8.12.11) with ESMTP id lB5F24MX003087GroupStudy
> >Mailer; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:02:04 -0500
> >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
> >(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lB5F24qX003085for ccielabxhiddenx;
> >Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:02:04 -0500
> >Received: from GVLSCEXC5.CORPORATE.VOX.NET<http://gvlscexc5.corporate.vox.net/>(
> mail5-se.nuvox.com
> >[ 216.215.144.44]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
> >SMTP id lB5F23EF003040 GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:02:03
> >-0500
> >Received: From EMAIL03.CORPORATE.VOX.NET<http://email03.corporate.vox.net/>([
> 10.1.18.58]) by
> >GVLSCEXC5.CORPORATE.VOX.NET <http://gvlscexc5.corporate.vox.net/>(WebShield SMTP
> v4.5 MR2); id
> >1196866916168; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:01:56 -0500
> >X-Message-Delivery: Vj0zLjQuMDt1cz0wO2k9MDtsPTA7YT0w
> >X-Message-Info:
> >i2DGWWdWdve4AHHCauTjK1r3/kyjy9eCBTZJT3+t1Tkj59d4dMzvVHd6ohGTT5aHZ1YouaY
> >TaBF6ltySwcAdiw==
> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> >Thread-Topic: OSPF Route Maniputation
> >Thread-Index: Acg3T8Zue3xO9xIRTK6amnfWz5AAcg==
> >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by GroupStudy
> >X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
> >X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from jasmith@nuvox\.com] (2007/12/05
> >10:02:04)
> >X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >X-Sequence: 8139
> >Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >Precedence: bulk
> >X-no-archive: yes
> >List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
> >List-Help: <mailto: sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
> >List-Subscribe:
> ><mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
> >List-Unsubscribe:
> ><mailto: sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
> >List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >List-Owner: <mailto: ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>
> >Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2007 15:12: 50.0229 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[4CE93650:01C83751]
> >
> >Hey Group,
> >
> >I am trying to figure out a way to change the cost of routes that are
> >inbound to a router. For instance, if I have 5 routes being advertised
> >from routerA and they are sent to RouterD via to equal cost paths (A
> >connects to B and C, B and C connect to D). How can I change RouterD
> >to prefer one of these networks via a single path without changing the
> >rest of the routes. Is there a way to do this by only configuring
> >router D, and of course you can't use static routes or change the cost
> >of any other networks.
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Jason Smith
> >
> >CCIE #12097
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >This email and any attachments ("Message") may contain legally
> >privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the
> >addressee, or if this Message has been addressed to you in error, you
> >are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute it, and we ask that you
> >please delete it (including all
> >copies) and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this
> >Message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be
> >deemed a waiver of confidentiality and/or a privilege.
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Las mejores tiendas, los precios mas bajos, entregas en todo el mundo,
> YupiMSN Compras: http://latam.msn.com/compras/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments ("Message") may contain legally privileged
> and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee, or if this
> Message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to
> read,
> copy, or distribute it, and we ask that you please delete it (including
> all
> copies) and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this Message
> to
> any person other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be deemed a
> waiver
> of confidentiality and/or a privilege.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This email and any attachments ("Message") may contain legally privileged
> and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee, or if this
> Message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read,
> copy, or distribute it, and we ask that you please delete it (including all
> copies) and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this Message to
> any person other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be deemed a waiver
> of confidentiality and/or a privilege.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST