From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2007 - 05:28:56 ART
Bhaskar,
I think what you want to do is write a route-map that
references an access-list or prefix-list that includes
the prefixes/addresses, etc. that you want to tag (90
in this case - 90? OSPF?).
Personally I'd tag the OSPF 110 but that's me.
And I'd save Tag 90 for EIGRP (Internal).
Just to keep things sane.
--- shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> distance is locally significant and not passed in
> routing updates, you can
> use route maps to match and set a tag but you do not
> have a way to pass the
> distance of a route to another neighbor as I
> mentioned and I would like to
> emphasize that Distance is locally significant!
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 9:25 AM, srinivas pv
> <vsrinivas.paturi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bhaskar,
> >
> > I think you can not use route-maps (using tags) in
> this case.
> >
> > We can use route-map with tags to filter the
> routes, or to set metric etc.
> > But I don't think we can change the distance.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Srinivas
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2007 3:10 AM, Bhaskar Sivanesan
> <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Group
> > >
> > > One of my scenario is am getting OSPF external
> routes some of which are
> > > tagged with route-tag of 90.
> > >
> > > Now I want to set the distance for routes tagged
> with 90 to 100 and
> > leave
> > > the rest to use the default. How can this be
> done? I can use the
> > distance
> > > command directly, but this would mean I need to
> create a acces-list with
> > all
> > > the prefixes, which would be very long as the
> prefixes are more.
> > >
> > > Can route-maps be useful here??
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST