From: Paul Cocker (paul.cocker@inbox.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2007 - 21:29:25 ART
Asim,
After applying the following config, and running a debug ip rip, we can see
that it works without passive-interface being applied.
Regards,
Paul
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
end
router rip
network 192.168.0.0
neighbor 192.168.0.2
Rack1R1#debug ip rip
RIP protocol debugging is on
*Mar 1 00:06:14.223: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via
FastEthernet0/0 (192.168.0.1)
*Mar 1 00:06:14.227: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
*Mar 1 00:06:14.231: RIP: sending v1 update to 192.168.0.2 via
FastEthernet0/0 (192.168.0.1)
*Mar 1 00:06:14.235: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
Rack1R1#
*Mar 1 00:06:19.091: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.095: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
*Mar 1 00:06:19.099: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.099: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
*Mar 1 00:06:19.103: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.107: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Asim
Zafar
Sent: 04 December 2007 23:33
To: Cisco certification
Subject: rip
Hi All,
Is it mandatory to configure passive interface to configure rip in unicast
mode
example:
passive interface fas0/0
neighbour x.x.x.x
-- Thanks & Regards,Asim Zafar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST