From: Ladee Geek (ladeegeek@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2007 - 16:09:54 ART
Tarun -
I'm asking about the dynamic lmi that gives me my pvc not the dynamic
frame-relay map of dlci to IP. Can you tell me how I would turn off LMI if
I am not to receive dynamic lmi infomraiton from the frame switch?
ladee
On 12/3/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You sure will!
> There are many issues that revolve around dynamic and static entries.
>
> Please read the last paragraph of this link and you will get a better
> understanding.
>
> <http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive>
> http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170741&seqNum=4&rl=1
>
> HTH,
> Tarun
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 12:08 PM, <ladeegeek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The LMI is communicating between the local frame switch and router. I
> > have a question about config verification and point structure. If I have a
> > main serial interface in the default nbma mode and no inverse arp I will not
> > get any dynmaic maps. No maps show up with sho frame map - as expected.
> > The sho lmi displays my communication to the frame switch is opperational -
> > as expected. BUT when I do a sho frame pvc - my pvc table is populated.
> >
> > I'm thinking that is the exact way it should show up. No maps, my LMI
> > connection active and the PVC table populated by the LMI data.
> >
> > Is there any way I would lose points on a router configured as such if
> > the requirements were to not allow dynamic mappings? Should I be trying to
> > find a way to control the LMI too?
> >
> > It's a matter of symantics. There are no dynamic mappings, but my
> > DLCI's and associated PVCs are dynamic?
> >
> > Thanks for the input.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
-- r/ Tammy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST