From: Bob Sinclair (bob@bobsinclair.net)
Date: Sat Dec 01 2007 - 00:05:41 ART
Paul Cocker wrote:
> ip route 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.255 10.0.0.1
>
>
> But I guess I'm missing a concept here. Hope that the above is clear? Any
> ideas?
>
>
Hi Paul,
I get the same result. To get the recursive lookup I did a static host
route to the learned route with the other spoke as the next hop.
In my case, the spokes are 123.2 and 123.3. The hub is 123.1. No frame
map to 123.3 on 123.2. Here are the relevant routes on R2. And the
ping works.
S 172.16.123.3/32 [1/0] via 172.16.123.1
C 172.16.123.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
S 172.16.103.1/32 [10/0] via 172.16.123.3
R 172.16.103.0/24 [120/2] via 172.16.123.3, 00:00:01, Serial1/0
So, To ping 103.1 it uses the host route to 123.3 and the recursive
route through 123.1.
:-)
--Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427 www.netmasterclass.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:28 ARST