From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 03:27:42 ART
I would lean towards the second option. It falls into the category of "an
ounce of prevention is worth a pound of the cure" type of thinking.
Remember that any complicated task can be broken down into simple sections.
If you have your process in place, you won't run out of time! Just don't
let the lab get the best of you! :)
Scott(4)
_____
From: Scott Vermillion [mailto:scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 6:50 PM
To: smorris@ipexpert.com; 'Chris Riling'
Cc: 'Rakesh Menon (rakmenon)'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Initial mistakes and correction - How to and when
Hey Scott4,
I strongly suspect that time management will be an issue for me come lab
day. Do you propose like one brief look-over and then one deep penetrating
read, or are two very thorough and thoughtful reads time well spent? With
all I'm reading about task interpretation these days, I'm leaning towards
the latter. But I'm already concerned about being able to finish in time to
verify anything at all, let alone everything.
Regards,
Scott(.5)
From: Scott Morris [mailto:smorris@ipexpert.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:45 PM
To: 'Chris Riling'
Cc: 'Scott Vermillion'; 'Rakesh Menon (rakmenon)'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Initial mistakes and correction - How to and when
I would read the lab and look at HOW MANY faults I was supposed to find. If
there was something major that made me paranoid about changing it, I'd go
ask the proctor "did you really do this?"
I would strongly recommend reading through the whole lab (twice!) BEFORE you
do any troubleshooting or touch your keyboard!!! That way you have a good
solid picture in your head of what is supposed to be there.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
_____
From: Chris Riling [mailto:criling@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:30 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Scott Vermillion; Rakesh Menon (rakmenon); Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Initial mistakes and correction - How to and when
I might be slightly paranoid about changing things that aren't specifically
spelled out in a task, not sure if I should be *this* paranoid or not. I
think I would quickly look over the info, and keep any possible problems in
the back of my head, then later if they created a problem with something I
was supposed to configure then I might start changing things... Is this a
horrible approach?
Chris
On 11/27/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
That always depends on the evils of the lab... :)
"sh ip int br | exc una" is a good place to get your IP addresses.
"sh run | in interface|ip address" is a good place to get your interface, IP
and MASK information.
"sh int | in is up|Internet" is a good place for interfaces that are really
up, plus IP and VLSM information.
Tweak things around for whatever you are searching for! But each lab may be
different in terms of how much is or is not preconfigured for you!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Vermillion
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:29 PM
To: 'Rakesh Menon (rakmenon)'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Initial mistakes and correction - How to and when
Hi Rakesh Menon,
What I have started doing in my practice labs is a simple 'sh run'
everywhere and also 'sh cdp neigh' to see if things are synched with the
topology drawing/lab text. You will typically find a few bad IP
assignments, IP address swaps b/t interfaces, etc. I don't know if you want
to be bothering with trying to come up with some type of automated ping
script at the outset of the lab. I think you should be able to pick up the
little surprises the proctors have left for you with a simple manual review
of things against the information given.
But my first date with the actual lab isn't for a few months yet, so take
that all with a grain of salt...
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com
<mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> ] On Behalf Of
Rakesh Menon (rakmenon)
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:38 AM
To: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: Initial mistakes and correction - How to and when
Hi All,
From what I have heard abt the lab, there are a few initial mistakes that u
have to correct to get a couple of marks (IP Addresses, Mask etc). Tried to
see if there is a pattern or flow that I could induct in my lab practise to
find these, but no avail. Just a beginner in the CCIE World so don't have
much idea abt lab strategy right now.
Please suggest if there are any Tips or Tricks that i can use to find these
initial glitches. And most importantly when should I start looking for
them..
Thanks in advance.
With Regards,
Rakesh Menon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:31 ART