RE: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2007 - 13:16:52 ART

• Next message: advitar84@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: OT: To suit or not to suit? That is the question."
• Previous message: iosluver@gmail.com: "3550 Priority Queue"
• Next in thread: Salau, Yemi: "RE: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Salau, Yemi: "RE: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Why would you want wfq in the "priority queue"?

I think you need to read Wendell Odom's qos book... jitter and buffers have
about a 20ms variable delay acceptance. WFQ is not going to guarantee
serialization delays. It simply waits for contention then handles
scheduling.

Or are you just testing things?

Thanks,

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CCIE
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 10:56 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ for the
priority Q?

In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ for the priority Q?

Class-map RTP

Match protocol rtp

Policy-map QoS

Class RTP

Fair-queue ==> it is not available here??????

Regards,

Amin

• Next message: advitar84@yahoo.com: "Re: Re: OT: To suit or not to suit? That is the question."
• Previous message: iosluver@gmail.com: "3550 Priority Queue"
• Next in thread: Salau, Yemi: "RE: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ"
• Maybe reply: Salau, Yemi: "RE: In Configuring CBWRQ-PQ (LLQ), how I could configure WFQ"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:30 ART