From: George Goglidze (goglidze@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2007 - 13:40:31 ART
Hi Dragan,
Sorry I forgot to mention what's the problem I'm having as a consequence.
In the lab, we're redistributing ospf routes to RIP so that R4 knows how to
come back.
so if it's V2, ofcourse R4 receives all the routes, but if it's V1 R4 does
not receive most of the routes
because of VLSM masks.
Now with V1 if I want R4 to be able to come back to all subnets, I need it
to have all routes or a 0.0.0.0 subnet.
I'm asked not to put a default or static route unless explicitly asked for.
So I can't use default static route on R4,
I can't use default route on R2 and redistribute it via RIP neither for the
same reason.
ip summary-address rip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on R2 on interface that connects to
R4 does not make difference.
I still can't see default route on R4.
Well I did finally found a solution,
with default-information originate.
but the problem I had was that, when I finally tried with
default-information originate command
at that moment I had ip summary-address rip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on the
interface as well,
and it didn't work.
I don't know why, but on ripv1 if you have summary-address of 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 and default-information originate,
it does not announce default route.
Then I took off the summary-address, and left just default-information
originate.
and it worked just fine.
I had 0.0.0.0 on R4.
Scott, thanks for your clarification.
I'll ask my company to check for new files, as they provided me with the
study material.
Many thanks anyway.
Regards,
On Nov 14, 2007 4:41 PM, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> The solution files that I show (which should be the same as on the
> download
> section of your ipexpert account) reflect RIPv1. The lab alludes to that
> and the PG specifically notes this as the solution.
>
> In the real lab today, it is doubtful you would get a requirement like
> this
> as Maurillio has stated specifically in the "Ask the Expert" forums that
> RIPv2 is the only version tested on. Now, you may still need to use
> "auto-summary" which we are all in a habit of turning off! but RIPv1
> should
> not be on the real lab exam.
>
> If you can, e-mail me the config files from this lab that you have, I'm
> interested in the file dates and such. Just unicast me as I don't think
> GS
> accepts attachments.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE-M
> #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> George Goglidze
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:45 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: ipexpert lab 30
>
> Hi all,
>
> In lab30 in RIP section they ask us to:
> All routing updates should not contain subnet mask information.
>
> I guess this is direct order not to use version 2!
> but in solutions there is version 2 used anyway.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART