From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2007 - 13:03:51 ART
Yup, it will. Sorry, it was my early-morning humor.
I suppose I should have put more text to explain. When people do ACLs they
seem to like to get everything down to one line despite the fact that it
permits 8000 extra things.
But good to catch that. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gupta, Gopal (NWCC) [mailto:gopal.gupta@hp.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 10:57 AM
To: Scott Morris; CJ; Cisco certification
Subject: RE: ACL-min lines
Hi Scott,
Wont statements below permit this 150.16.10.0/24 subnet (Which we want to
deny).
Thanks
Gops
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 20:46
To: 'CJ'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: ACL-min lines
Importance: Low
acl 10 permit 150.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
acl 10 permit 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
:)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of CJ
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 2:57 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: ACL-min lines
Dear group
By only using permit statements what would be the best way to do the
following in as minimum acl entries as possible,
- deny 150.16.10.0/24
- permit 150.16.0.0/16
- permit 10.10.0.0/16
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART