From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2007 - 17:58:14 ART
I would be very careful with taking this path though because you may change
things that you did earlier in IGP/BGP which may lead you to break things
you previously would have had points for!
If you get an answer from a proctor, make sure it's VERY specific if you
believe that mroutes aren't allowed either as it may simply be a
misunderstanding of functionality.
You have another alternative, of course, although it's not technically part
of the blueprint. :) The multicast address-family within MBGP will
accomplish the same thing on a dynamic basis as static mroutes do.
HTH,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Vermillion
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:40 PM
To: 'Alex Steer'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: static mroute in lab
Hey Alex,
I skipped ahead to the mcast section of the CoD I'm doing so I can get my
head into that topic area before the study group tonight. According to the
Brians, this is a proctor-worthy clarification to seek.
BTW, if the answer is given and it's that "no static routes encompasses
static mroutes," then you simply manipulate your unicast IGP to achieve the
RPF you desire.
Regards,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Alex
Steer
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 11:10 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: static mroute in lab
Sorry just another quick one.
I asked a guy this morning and was told no but thought I would ask anyway.
Does the "no static routes allowed" include mroutes does anyone know?
It would be nice if you could J
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART