From: George Goglidze (goglidze@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2007 - 11:47:02 ART
Hi Scott,
Thanks for clarification.
it does not break anything.
the problem is that, when I see something I think I was not asked to do, I
start to question all my abilities to interpret the tasks.
and it makes me think maybe my English or my technical skills are not good
enough, or whatever.
I understand in real life, that would be a good thing to do.
but we're working on lab. and are using these workbooks to make sure we know
things before we go for the real thing.
this workbooks should be designed with this in mind, and not bring any
confusions in something as serious as a CCIE lab.
As I go through all the sections (I'm on 25th now), I understand that the
solutions that are given are not worth the price we pay for it.
My company is looking forward for buying internetworkexpert now. hope it
will be at least a little better.
On the other hand, I might not have time to go through internetworkexpert
too, as my exam is planned for 31st of January,
and labs take a lot time, considering that I'm working full time 9am to 6pm.
Many thanks and regards,
On 11/4/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> That particular lab does not have a specific requirement for summarization
> (other than the total stub area). It is something that is sometimes done
> to minimize the route table in real life, and perhaps something the person
> who created this lab was used to doing.
>
> It doesn't fall into my rule of "no more no less" but it doesn't interfere
> with any other requirement either. I will lab this one back up and make
> sure the solutions don't break any rules, but plain old summarization is
> just to make things look tidier. (in theory!)
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE-M
> #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> George Goglidze
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 1:35 PM
> To: Joseph Brunner
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: ipexpert v9.0 lab 23
>
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Thanks, that's the thing, in the Seciton 23 lab, they don't ask you to
> filter anything.
> Thanks for your help anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 11/3/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > Area range is used for LSA 3 (summary) filtering also, as well as
> > summarizing.
> >
> > Did any task say something like "all /32 routes should not appear",
> > etc outside area X (from a P2MP network, etc.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Joe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of George Goglidze
> > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 11:50 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: ipexpert v9.0 lab 23
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In answers, they do "area range", but I read the lab many times, and
> > I don't find anywhere where it would ask to summarize anything.
> > not directly, not indirectly (at least I think so).
> >
> > Can you please tell me, according which task, we assume that we have
> > to summarize?
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:28 ART