From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Nov 02 2007 - 21:07:21 ART
It's not just about peering. Who do you see for the next hop IP address in
your route exchanges? Gotta figure out how to get there, right? :)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
sirus MOGHADASIAN
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 6:30 PM
To: Chris Riling
Cc: Joseph Saad; groupstudy
Subject: Re: is it necessary to map L3 to L2 add of IPv6 in frame-relay
spoke-to-spoke connection?
Thanks all for answering but I think u misunderstand my question,
My qustion was not why we use link-local address in ipv6 , the question is
why we need additional ipv6 link-local address,for example link-local
address of R2 on R5?? I said I think if I map R1 link local address on R5
,every think will be correct but why in some workbooks do additional mapping
(R2 link local mapping in R5?? according to the fact that there is no need
that R5 and R2 become neighbor.
Cyrus
On 11/1/07, Chris Riling <criling@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yep... think about it... the v6 routing protocols use it for next hop,
> and you could have two v6 global unicast addresses on each side of a
> p2p link that are in different subnets, and it *should* still work
> (haven't gotten a chance to lab it yet), because it uses link locals
> for communication - it took me a little while to get used to that...
> :)
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 10/31/07, Joseph Saad <joseph.samir.saad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Also, to establish neighbors on NBMA networks, you'll need to refer
> > to
> the
> > neighbor's ipv6 link-local address. Which is, by the way, an
> > interface-level command.
> >
> > On 11/1/07, Chris Riling <criling@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The v6 protocols seem to like to use the link local addresses for
> > > next hop, so I'd make sure there's a way for resolve the link
> > > locals... Take a
> > look
> > > at
> > > the v6 routing table when you get OSPF up and you'll see why you
> > > need it...
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > On 10/31/07, hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com <hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You need this when running ospf in hub-and-spoke topology using
> > > > broadcast or non-broacast network type. Match like ipv4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > > > Behalf
> > Of
> > > > ext sirus MOGHADASIAN
> > > > Sent: mercredi 31 octobre 2007 14:44
> > > > To: Cisco certification
> > > > Subject: is it necessary to map L3 to L2 add of IPv6 in
> > > > frame-relay spoke-to-spoke connection?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Gs,
> > > >
> > > > R5 ------R1---------R2
> > > >
> > > > R1 ,R2 ,R5 run frame-relay on their main serial interface.
> > > >
> > > > I ran Ipv6 and Ripng on them.
> > > >
> > > > I have v6 routes is each routers table
> > > >
> > > > R5:
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial1/0
> > > >
> > > > ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::5/64
> > > > ipv6 address FE80::5 link-local
> > > > ipv6 rip 1 enable
> > > > frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE00:15FF:FE2C:0 501
> broadcast frame-relay
> > > > map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::1 501 broadcast frame-relay map ipv6
> > > > 2001:CC1E:1:125::2 501 broadcast
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > R1 :
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial1/0
> > > > ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::1/64
> > > > ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
> > > > ipv6 rip 1 enable
> > > > frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE01:15FF:FE2C:0 102
> broadcast frame-relay
> > > > map ipv6 FE80::CE04:15FF:FE2C:0 105 broadcast frame-relay map
> > > > ipv6
> > > > 2001:CC1E:1:125::2 102 broadcast frame-relay map ipv6
> > > > 2001:CC1E:1:125::5 105 broadcast
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > R2 :
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial1/0
> > > > ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::2/64
> > > > ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
> > > > ipv6 rip 1 enable
> > > > frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE00:15FF:FE2C:0 201
> broadcast frame-relay
> > > > map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::1 201 broadcast frame-relay map ipv6
> > > > 2001:CC1E:1:125::5 201 broadcast
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Question is : Is there any nedd to L3 to L2 link-local mapping
> > > > for
> R2
> > on
> > > > R5 s1/0 ??? I see this solution with L3 to L2 mapping in some
> > > > workbooks.
> > > >
> > > > As I said every thing is right ,I think this L3->L2 mapping will
> > > > be redundant.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > any idea?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cyrus
> > > >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:27 ART