From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 02 2007 - 06:23:10 ART
why would you need here nested policy?
also you are not asked to shape traffic just to gurntee 256Kbps for that
specific host and protocol.
policy-map BW
class SMTP
bandwidth 256
On 11/2/07, Champika G <693455@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> This task says that SMTP traffic from and to the server over the FR
> cloud should be guaranteed 256 KBPS. The port speed is at 512KBPS in
> the FR links.
> R3 & R5 are connected to the FR cloud via two subinterfaces.
>
> I assume that the right eay to do it is by configuring a heirarchical
> policy map and appyling it to the sub interface. But the SG uses a
> noremal policymap with bandwidth command and applies it to the
> phsyical interface. Isnt this wrong ??
>
> My config was;
>
>
> class-map match-all SMTP
> match access-group name SMTP
> !
> !
> policy-map BW
> class SMTP
> bandwidth 256
> policy-map PARENT
> class class-default
> shape average 256000
> service-policy BW
>
> interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
> bandwidth 512
> backup delay 1 1
> backup interface Serial0/1
> ip address 132.1.35.5 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 513
> service-policy output PARENT
> !
>
> ip access-list extended SMTP
> permit tcp any host 132.1.3.100 eq smtp
>
> Appreciate some help please? THanks
>
> Champ
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:27 ART