From: sirus MOGHADASIAN (cyrus.mgh@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:44:08 ART
Hi Gs,
R5 ------R1---------R2
R1 ,R2 ,R5 run frame-relay on their main serial interface.
I ran Ipv6 and Ripng on them.
I have v6 routes is each routers table
R5:
interface Serial1/0
ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::5/64
ipv6 address FE80::5 link-local
ipv6 rip 1 enable
frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE00:15FF:FE2C:0 501 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::1 501 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::2 501 broadcast
R1 :
interface Serial1/0
ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::1/64
ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
ipv6 rip 1 enable
frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE01:15FF:FE2C:0 102 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE04:15FF:FE2C:0 105 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::2 102 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::5 105 broadcast
R2 :
interface Serial1/0
ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1:125::2/64
ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
ipv6 rip 1 enable
frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::CE00:15FF:FE2C:0 201 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::1 201 broadcast
frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1:125::5 201 broadcast
Question is : Is there any nedd to L3 to L2 link-local mapping for R2 on R5
s1/0 ??? I see this solution with L3 to L2 mapping in some workbooks.
As I said every thing is right ,I think this L3->L2 mapping will be
redundant.
any idea?
Cyrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:19 ART