From: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com
Date: Mon Oct 29 2007 - 12:44:28 ART
It was my question and Scott Moriss s answer was that startup time is
(maxage + 2*fwddelay) = 50s
In your case, auusuming you are using STP (in RSTP where is no listing),
you can use maxage= 10s and fwddelay = 2s
Is it true Scott?
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ext Gary Duncanson
Sent: samedi 27 octobre 2007 23:12
To: Scott Vermillion
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Getting a por to be in forwarding state in 14 seconds ....
Hi Scott
I have no idea how the archives work. I guess what Im saying is check
about this recently. I think the 14 second thing on switches was covered
by Scott Morris just a week or two ago.
Regards
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Vermillion" <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>
To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'ccie1101'"
<ccie1101@gmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:42 PM
Subject: RE: Getting a por to be in forwarding state in 14 seconds ....
> OK all, I have a question:
>
> How are you searching the archives?? Because when I try to search the
> CCIE
> list, the most recent results I get range anywhere from late 2004 to
early
> 2007! We used to have a very nice search function on the professional
> board
> but Paul had to disable it because it was apparently crashing the
server.
> But there must be something more effective than what I'm doing, which
is
> going here:
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/search
>
> So just as an example, I just plugged "Frame Relay" into the CCIE R&S
list
> and sorted by date in reverse order. The most recent result I get is
a
> post
> on 3/07/2007. I suppose we've had one or two FR posts between now and
> that
> time, wouldn't you say? What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thx,
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Gary
> Duncanson
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:06 AM
> To: ccie1101
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Getting a por to be in forwarding state in 14 seconds
....
>
> Check recent archives. I believe our friend Scott Morris covered this
one.
>
> HTH
>
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ccie1101" <ccie1101@gmail.com>
> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Getting a por to be in forwarding state in 14 seconds
....
>
>
>> GS,
>> The question asks a total link startup delay of 14 seconds, at
fist
>> instance I just did the following,
>> spanning-tree vlan 30 forward-time 14 but the TOTAL LINK delay is
Hello +
>> Forward Delay + Max Age.
>>
>> So therefore to get the port to be up in 14 seconds, would it be
:-
>> spanning-tree vlan 30 forward-delay 6
>> spanning-tee vlan 30 max-age 6
>>
>> and 2 seconds is for BPDU which gives us 14 seconds in total for
the
>> link to be up. Would this logic be
>> correct ?
>>
>> Pls advice,
>>
>> ccie1101.
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:19 ART