From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 01:00:40 ART
When you receive your lab, it will have all that information there. So you
can see how many points each section has.
There is no magic formula, each exam may be different. That's what makes
the grade report difficult. While they give you percentages of major
sections, it's up to you to remember how many points there were in
correlation to the blueprint in order to attempt to figure out a score.
In the long run, the score really doesn't matter! If you don't get 80
points, you get a score report in order to help you figure out which areas
of the blueprint you need more work on than others. If you do get 80
points, you get your CCIE number, and NOT a score report.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Toh
Soon, Lim
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:17 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Ben Holko; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Question on grading and sections
Hi Scott,
Are you able to tell how are the points allocated?
Are there going to be many tasks in a section with little points or vice
versa?
Thank you.
B.Rgds,
Lim TS
On 10/25/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> No, the partial credit rule has to do with tasks INSIDE a point
> section. So if each of those subsections (1.1, 1.2, etc) had two
> tasks each but you only did one of them correctly in 1.3, you could
> get points for 1.1, 1.2, 1.4and
> 1.5 still.
>
> Now, there are "exceptions" or variations to that. This is a
> results-based grading in most instances. So there's a chance that
> what you did not get working in 1.1 made it impossible for 1.4 and 1.5
> to work, so by that you would lose multiple areas.
>
> Having the right commands in doesn't necessarily mean that things are
> working everywhere you expect. That's why it's important to do your
> own show/debugs to let the router/switch tell you that you've done a good
job!
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Ben Holko
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:36 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Question on grading and sections
>
> Hey peeps,
>
> Quick question on grading, the exam guide says something like you need
> to get all points in a section for it to be marked correct, no points
> are awarded for a partially completed or partially correct section.
>
> that's cool, my question is what constitutes a "section"
>
> For example, if Bridging and Switching is task "1" and has sub tasks such:
>
> 1.1 2 points
> 1.2 2 points
> 1.3 3 point
> 1.4 2 points
> 1.5 3 points
>
> does that mean I have to 1.1-5 all correct to get any points (12 in
> this
> case) in bridging and switching, or does it mean I have to get all of
> 1.1 right to get my 2 points, all of 1.2 right to get another 2
> points, etc etc ??
>
> Ben
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:18 ART