RE: Help with Eigrp redistribution

From: Cecil Wilson (Cecil.Wilson@flextronics.com)
Date: Mon Oct 22 2007 - 18:14:24 ART


Sachin
 I am running both eigrp 10 and eigrp 100 on the same router R2
Router 2
Router eigrp 10
Red eigrp 100
Net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0
Net 2.2.100.2 0.0.0.0

Router eigrp 100
Red eigrp 10
Net 150.2.2.2 0.0.0.0

Router ospf 2
Net 2.2.100.2 area 0
Red eigrp 10

R3
Router ospf 2
Net 2.2.100.3 area 0

Sho ip ro

Cecil G. Wilson
IT Network Services
Office: (901) 215-2710
Cell: (901) 601-6201
VoIP 104-2710
FLEX Logistics
cecil.wilson@flextronics.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Herbert Maosa
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:17 AM
To: Sachin Bhatia
Cc: Donghai Zhang; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Help with Eigrp redistribution

I would suggest that you turn off the redistribution, then dump to us
the output of the show ip route command. We need to verify that to begin
with this route exists in the routing table and that it belongs to EIGRP
10.
Remember that redistribution only works if the route appears in the
routing table as belonging to the source protocol.

On 10/22/07, Herbert Maosa <asawilunda@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> You dont need to explicitly configure metric when redistributing from
> one EIGRP process to another EIGRP process. The metrics from the other

> process carry over, and will be understood by the recieving eigrp
process.
>
>
> On 10/22/07, Sachin Bhatia <sachin.bhatia21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hope u get the point wt Donghai mentioned:
> > for ur config to work u shud hve smething like:
> > R1
> > *Router eigrp 10*
> > Red eigrp 100 B, D, R, L, M
> > Network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> > Net 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> > Net 4.4.100.1 0.0.0.0
> >
> > *Router eigrp 100
> > *Red eigrp 10 B, D, R, L, M
> > Net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0
> > Net 4.4.100.2 0.0.0.0
> >
> > remembr to filter if there are mre than 1 red points.
> >
> > HTH.
> > Sachin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/22/07, Donghai Zhang <zdh1207@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear,
> > > No redistribution occur if two different routing protocol
> > > processes
> > are
> > > run
> > > on the same router.So you have to activate eirgrp 10 on R2 or
> > > activate eigrp 100 on R1, otherwide the redistribution would not
> > > work.
> > >
> > > 2007/10/22, raul raul < juvenn@hotmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > you need to include metric for eigrp redistribution
> > > >
> > > > example
> > > >
> > > > eigrp 10
> > > > redistribute eigrp 100 subnet metric 1000 100 255 1 1500
> > > > > From: scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> To:
> > > > > Cecil.Wilson@flextronics.com;
> > > > joe@affirmedsystems.com; gary.duncanson@googlemail.com;
> > > > anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject:
> > RE:
> > > > Help with Eigrp redistribution> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:14:43
> > -0600> >
> > > Hey
> > > > Cecil,> > You have EIGRP enabled via 'net 4.4.100.1 0.0.0.0' on
> > > > R1
> > and
> > > the
> > > > same for> the .2 on R2. But EIGRP requires that the AS number be
> > common
> > > > between the> two routers; it is not simply a process ID, such as

> > > > the
> >
> > > case w/
> > > > OSPF. So> presumably you aren't seeing an adjacency coming up
> > between
> > > these
> > > > two> routers, no?> > Regards,> > Scott> > -----Original
> > Message----->
> > > From:
> > > > nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > > Of>
> > Cecil
> > > > Wilson> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:54 PM> To: Joseph
> > > > Wilson> Brunner;
> > Gary
> > > > Duncanson; anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc:
> > > > ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Subject: Help with Eigrp redistribution> > Hello GS> I am having
> > > problems
> > > > redistrinte a subnet from eigrp into the routing> t!
> > > > able example> > R1 > Router eigrp 10> Red eigrp 100 > Network
> > 1.1.1.1
> > > > 0.0.0.0 > Net 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0> Net 4.4.100.1 0.0.0.0 > > R2>
> > Router
> > > > eigrp 100> Red eigrp 10> Net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0> Net 4.4.100.2
> > > > 0.0.0.0>
> > >
> > > Sho
> > > > ip ro ? No network 150.1.1.0> I played with the metric but can
> > > > not
> > get
> > > to
> > > > see the 150.1.1.0 network on> the other routers?> Can someone
> > > > tell
> > me
> > > what
> > > > I maybe missing, how to get this network to> redistribute?>
> > > > Thanks>
> > > >
> > > > Cecil G. Wilson > IT Network Services > Office: (901) 215-2710 >
> > Cell:
> > > (901)
> > > > 601-6201 > VoIP 104-2710> FLEX Logistics>
> > cecil.wilson@flextronics.com >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:
> > > > nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Joseph Brunner> Sent:
> > > > Saturday, October 20, 2007 10:28 AM> To: 'Gary Duncanson';
> > > > anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject:
> > RE:
> > > > interesting> > Another thing guys,> > Many job Interviews I have
> > been
> > > asked
> > > > what rfc's I have read lately?> What are my favorites?> > Cool
> > > > huh?>
> > > !
> > > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailt!
> > > > o:nobody
> > > >
> > > > @groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Gary Duncanson> Sent: Saturday,
> > October
> > > 20,
> > > > 2007 11:19 AM> To: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc:
> > > > ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Re: interesting> > Anthony,> >
> > That's
> > > > very true.> > Gary> ----- Original Message -----> From: <
> > > > anthony.sequeira@thomson.com>> To: < shiranp3@gmail.com>; <
> > > > ccielab@groupstudy.com>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 3:05
> > > > PM>
> > > > Subject: RE: interesting> > > > That is awesome! > > > > It is
> > amazing
> > > how
> > > > many of the RFCs are critical to read. For the CCIE> > Written,
> > > > I
> > find
> > > that
> > > > many of the questions come directly from these> > documents. I
> > > > also
> > find
> > > > that much of the "documentation" you see out> > there these days

> > > > is
> > > almost a
> > > > cut and paste from the original RFC. > > > > Anthony J Sequeira>

> > > > >
> > > #15626> >
> > > > Don't Cheat Yourself - Learn> >
> > > > http://www.netmasterclass.com/CCIE/Self-Paced-Program/Written/>
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:
> > > > nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf> Of> > shiran guez> > Sent: S!
> > > > aturday, October 20, 2007 9:25 AM> > To: Cisco certification> >
> > Subject:
> > > > interesting> > > > Today I went trough RFC 2281 Cisco Hot
> > > > interesting> > > > standby
> > router
> > > > protocol (HSRP)> > > > and what was interesting is that although

> > > > it
> > is
> > > Cisco
> > > > HSRP, it was> > written> > by 2 Juniper and 2 Cisco People.> > I
> > think
> > > it
> > > > should be called JUCI HSRP :-)> > > > -- > > Shiran Guez> > MCSE
> > CCNP
> > > NCE1>
> > > > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com > >
> > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3>
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___>
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at: > >
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > > >>
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___>
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at: > >
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___>
> > > > Subscription information may be found at: >
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> > > > ____________________________________!
> > > > ___________________________________> Subscription information !
> > > > may be f
> > > >
> > > > ound at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > Legal

> > > > Disclaimer:> The information contained in this message may be
> > privileged
> > > > and> confidential. It is intended to be read only by the
> > > > and> individual
> > or
> > > > entity to> whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the
> > > > reader
> > of
> > > this
> > > > message is> not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
> > > > any distribution of this> message, in any form, is strictly
prohibited.
> > If
> > > you
> > > > have received this> message in error, please immediately notify
> > > > the
> > > sender
> > > > and delete or destroy> any copy of this message> >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___>
> > > > Subscription information may be found at: >
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___>
> > > > Subscription information may be found at: >
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > > _ Express yourself with the latest Windows Live Messenger! Get
> > > > it free
> >
> > > > today!
> > > > http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
> > > >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>

--
Kindest regards,
hm


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:17 ART