RE: RE: conditional default advertising in BGP with multiple

From: Usankin, Andrew (Andrew.Usankin@twtelecom.com)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 15:13:44 ART


 Since "neighbor route-map" command filters through updates sent to
neighbor and not through the routes in a routing table - it won't work.
At least I couldn't figure out how to make it work in my lab... almost
broke my head over this one already.

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Koen Zeilstra
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:08 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Fwd: RE: conditional default advertising in BGP with multiple
routes tomonitor

Balmik has email this nice solution to me which I would like to share
with the group.

Balmik, I hope you don't mind that I send this to the group.

I have tested this on my lab and the results in various situations on
different platforms

Situation 1. It only checks line 10 of the route-map, and ignores the
rest.
Situation 2. It does a OR. So both routes have to dissapear to remove
the default instead of one.

From:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6566/products_feature_guide09186a0
0801a7f7a.html#wp1038479

I read that outbound BGP route-maps only are supported. I would say this
is a outbound BGP route-map. The only different from standard
advertisement is de conditional default. Maybe it is only intended for
match and set operations on advertised routes.

----- Forwarded message from balmik@staff.iinet.net.au -----
     Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:07:49 +0800
     From: Balmik Soin <balmik@staff.iinet.net.au>
Reply-To: Balmik Soin <balmik@staff.iinet.net.au>
  Subject: RE: conditional default advertising in BGP with multiple
routes tomonitor
       To: Koen Zeilstra <koen@koenzeilstra.com>, Bob Sinclair
<bob@bobsinclair.net>
       Cc: Saul Arjona <saul.arjona.bueno@gmail.com>

(Removing CCIE groupstudy list for this email)

I'm not able to test this at the moment, but can I suggest you try a
CONTINUE route-map statement to try and get an AND working?

Something like a

Route-map XXX permit 10
  Match ip address prefix-list 1
  Continue 30

Route-map XXX deny 20

Route-map XXX permit 30
  Match ip address prefix-list 2

I don't know if "continue" will work for these kinds of route-maps, but
it's worth a try - if it works, then you can post it to GroupStudy. I
just didn't want to post a "perhaps" email to the group without testing
it, and ending up wasting people's time :)

--
Balmik Soin
Voice Network Engineer                        Desk: +61-8-9213-1370
Voice Engineering - Network Services        Mobile: +61-414-429-266
iiNet Limited                             balmik@staff.iinet.net.au

> -----Original Message----- > From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:koen@koenzeilstra.com] > Sent: Friday, 19 October 2007 1:14 PM > To: Bob Sinclair > Cc: Balmik Soin; Saul Arjona; ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: conditional default advertising in BGP with multiple routes > tomonitor > > Yes we do have a solution for the OR, now we still need a solution for

> the AND function. Matching both routes for one descision. > > > > Quoting Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>: > > > Koen Zeilstra wrote: > >> Correct. The conditions are never met for ACL 10. > >> > >> I have labbed the original and this solution up, no AND just OR. > >> > > Absolutely right! I stand corrected. So do we have a solution for OR? > > > > -- > > > > > > Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427 > > www.netmasterclass.net >

----- End forwarded message -----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:17 ART