From: Schoeneman Steve (gs@grimnotions.com)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 14:11:26 ART
Check to see if you have an IGP route to the next hop of the route
with the higher preference.
Steve
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Cagri Yucel wrote:
> Chaps, any idea on below ? Why the route with lower localpref and
> higher
> metric is preferred as best ?
> Both has next hop reachability and both has weight 0.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> BGP routing table entry for 24867:522:10.3.3.0/24, version 161558
>
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table ciptex-vrf)
>
> Not advertised to any peer
>
> Local, imported path from 24867:12000:10.3.3.0/24
>
> 85.133.21.1 (metric 61) from 62.140.218.2 (62.140.218.2)
>
> Origin incomplete, metric 10, localpref 120, valid, internal
>
> Extended Community: RT:24867:12000
>
> Originator: 85.133.21.1, Cluster list: 0.0.0.102
>
> mpls labels in/out nolabel/277
>
> Local, imported path from 24867:12005:10.3.3.0/24
>
> 62.140.219.20 (metric 111) from 62.140.218.2 (62.140.218.2)
>
> Origin incomplete, metric 10, localpref 100, valid, internal,
> best
>
> Extended Community: RT:24867:12005 Cost:pre-bestpath:129:281856
>
> 0x8800:0:0 0x8801:302:25856 0x8802:65281:256000
> 0x8803:65281:1500
>
> 0x8804:0:2887647242 0x8805:3:0
>
> Originator: 62.140.219.20, Cluster list: 0.0.0.102, 0.0.0.101
>
> mpls labels in/out nolabel/47
>
>
> --
> -cagri
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:17 ART