From: Navid Daghighi (daghighi.navid@free.fr)
Date: Wed Oct 17 2007 - 06:09:26 ART
Well, I guess there is no incoherence in Cisco doc, they just assumed
that the host had a default-gateway configured, this is why it does no
need to send an ARP.
And no mistake in IE lab either, sorry.
Navid Daghighi a icrit :
> Hi,
>
> Either I missed something, or there is an incoherence between cisco
> doc and IE proxy lab.
>
> Cisco doc says on Document ID: 13718 (Proxy-ARP, page 4) : when Host B
> (172.16.10.200/24) tries to send packets to destination Host D
> (172.16.20.200), it will not ARP for Host D IP address because it
> belongs to a different subnet than what is configured on Host B
> ethernet interface.
>
> IE proxy lab (IP services, ver 4.1) shows with debug ARP that host R1
> (no ip routing - 155.1.146.1 / 24) does send an ARP to R4 (155.1.0.4
> /24), even though R1 knows that 155.1.0.4 is not on his subnet
> 155.1.146.0 /24.
>
> What did I miss ?
>
> Is there a mistake on IE lab, where masks should be /16 instead of /24 ?
>
> thanks,
> Navid
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:15 ART