From: sheherezada@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:03:23 ART
Thanks a lot, Matthew! - it is good to know.
Mihai
On 10/16/07, Matthew Long <mlong@comms-care.com> wrote:
> There is something called "Asymmetric Routing Support" not sure if this
> is what you are getting at.
>
> Take a look at:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/f
> ailover.html#wp1102712
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> sheherezada@gmail.com
> Sent: 16 October 2007 13:17
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: ASA active-active question
>
> Hi,
>
> Given:
>
> - two ASA configured for active/active failover
> - two security contexts
>
> I know that I can actually load balance so that one ASA be active for
> one context and another one be active for the other context. What
> happens to traffic received on the secondary IP address (i.e. received
> by the ASA that is not active for a given context)? Does the
> secondary pass through the traffic? In other words, can I load
> balance in the same context? (guess not, but I don't have the ASAs to
> experiment)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mihai
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:15 ART