From: sheherezada@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:58:57 ART
Thanks!
Mihai
On 10/16/07, Tony Schaffran <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
> The whole Active/Active load balancing thing is just a big illusion that
> Cisco has created.
>
> I hate this because when I explain the reality to my customers, they are
> extremely disappointed and I have to do damage control caused by the sales
> team.
>
> As you have described it, one ASA is active for one context and the other
> ASA is active for the other context.
>
> They will not load balance a single context across both ASA's.
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> sheherezada@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 5:17 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: ASA active-active question
>
> Hi,
>
> Given:
>
> - two ASA configured for active/active failover
> - two security contexts
>
> I know that I can actually load balance so that one ASA be active for
> one context and another one be active for the other context. What
> happens to traffic received on the secondary IP address (i.e. received
> by the ASA that is not active for a given context)? Does the
> secondary pass through the traffic? In other words, can I load
> balance in the same context? (guess not, but I don't have the ASAs to
> experiment)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mihai
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:15 ART