From: Simon Grace (SimonG@pcsystems.gr)
Date: Sun Oct 14 2007 - 12:49:18 ART
HI Jef
I'm just about to finish up for the day but a quick one from me.
The access list will not match anything as you don't have any permit
statements and there is a explicit deny everythin at the end. You need
the ACL to match something if you are stating it with the match
statement in the class-map.
Off the top of my head, have you thought about permitting IP with the
ACL and then doing a "match not" in the class-map.
All of the above is a bit rushed but I thought I'd jot a couple of
things down in case they gave you some other things to think about
Cheers,
Simon.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jeff Koh
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 5:33 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Question on QoS
Hi there,
class-map match-any DSCP-IN-Voice
match access-group name DSCP-IN-Voice
match ip dscp ef
match ip dscp 43
policy-map COS-IN
class DSCP-IN-Voice
set ip dscp ef
ip access-list extended DSCP-IN-Voice
deny ip any any
interface Vlan200
service-policy input COS-IN
in the class-map, the first match statement is infact deny any ip, my
question is, does this condition match and it will move out of this
class and set ip dscp ef?
Or it should never be matched since the access-list will only be matched
for a permit statement else it wont? Since i have the match-any on the
class-map it will go to the next statement? thanks!!
thanks!
jef
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:14 ART