From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2007 - 08:35:47 ART
They should. But who really cares? Instead of wondering if we will get the
same lab let's get back to understanding if BGP does load balancing or load
sharing ;)
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Farhan Anwar" <farhan.anwar@gmail.com>
To: "Felix Nkansah" <felixnkansah@gmail.com>
Cc: <sheherezada@gmail.com>; <juvenn@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: what is the possibilities to get same lab again
> Don't they have some thing like a lab scenario number tracking that tracks
> which lab was given to the candidate# xxxxxxx last time so that the
> automated system would exclude that lab# from the available list if its
> still there.
>
>
> On 10/12/07, Felix Nkansah <felixnkansah@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mihai,
>>
>> Truly speaking, I cant really know whether several dozens of labs r
>> really
>> developed each month or not.
>>
>> Mine is based on several articles I have read in magazines, interviews,
>> forums, etc over the years on this question and the ccie lab development
>> processes at cisco, by ccie program managers.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I do not have the links readily available (would have to
>> do
>> some 'digging' if I have to).
>>
>> But whether or not there is that extent of commitment from cisco or not
>> is
>> irrelevant in this instance tho.
>>
>> As you rightly said, "Bottom line, better not count on repeating lab
>> happening." Scott also made some good points there.
>>
>> As I said, it is possible, but not probable.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Farhan Anwar
> www.farhananwar.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:14 ART