From: Con Spathas (con@spathas.net)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2007 - 06:40:43 ART
I've always been under the impression that things get a bit flakey if you
don't follow the correct order of operations.
Ie:
Create ACL/Prefix-List (if that's what you're using)
Bind ACL/Pfx-list to a route-map
Bind route-map to a redist statement.
If you change the route-map or the acl - unbind things in reverse and then
rebind.
Maybe I'm being pedantic but I imagine doing so may help avoid any potential
issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Singhal
Sent: Saturday, 13 October 2007 10:10
To: Malcolm Salmons
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Referencing a route-map that doesnt exist
Malcolm,
It won't redistribute any routes into ospf. It will redistribute BGP routes
once you have created route map with your matching criteria
Regards,
Nisha
On 10/12/07, Malcolm Salmons <malcolm.salmons@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I wonder if you can clarify something for me. In an OSPF configuration
> if redistribution between ospf and bgp is configured as below:
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute bgp 65000 subnets route-map bgp2ospf
>
> But no route-map bgp2ospf has been created will this statement match
> all bgp routes and redistribute them, or will it match no routes? I
> think it wont match any routes but confirmation/correction would be
> good.
>
> Thanks
>
> Malcolm
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:14 ART