From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:20:34 ART
176.1.127.*7*
176.1.127.*1 *
**
*it do not look like the same next hop!*
On 10/11/07, Shine Joseph <shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Can someone shed some lights why would you see the following behaviour?
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> * 28.119.16.0/24 176.1.127.7 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
> * 28.119.17.0/24 176.1.127.7 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
> * 112.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 50 60
> i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> 50 60 i
> * 113.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 60 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> 60 i
> * 114.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
> * 115.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
> * 116.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
> * 117.0.0.0 176.1.127.1 200 0 100 54 i
> *> 176.1.127.1 100 0 300 200 100
> 54
> i
>
> The BGP prefixes learned from two routers show the same next hop. And when
> you look at the path, they are different.
>
> TIA
> Shine
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:13 ART