From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 04:39:19 ART
if the link is down then it will not be able to forward anything, and R3
will not send any thing to R4. but the solution is to do the peering based
on the loopback then it will not have a problem even if one physical
interface is down.
On 10/10/07, slevin kremera <slevin.kremera@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> R1
> / \
> / \
> r3-----r4
> / \ / \
> / \ / \
> r2 r5 r2
>
>
> here all the routers are in as100. r1-r3-r4 are full meshed and peering
> wit
> lo0. r2 and r5 are peering with r3 and r4..I am planning to make r2 and r5
> as rr-clients for r3 and r4
>
> .The question here is if the link between r1 and r4 is broken and r1
> recieves an ebgp updates from outside..will it fwd it to R4??
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:13 ART