From: Usankin, Andrew (Andrew.Usankin@twtelecom.com)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2007 - 20:11:24 ART
Yep, that's right. Cisco could have mentioned sanity check in their
documentation. But for those who wants to go "beyond" there are
originals - RFCs ;) At least that is what I had to go through once when
I had the same question.
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 3:13 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: sh ntp associations detail
A big up to Guy for pointing me to this document from Sun. Cisco could
learn a thing or two about docs from them, if thats the way all Sun's
docs are written. For those interested the middle of page 5 lists the
sanity checks that NTP runs
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0901/NTPpt3.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grace Simon" <SimonG@pcsystems.gr>
To: "John" <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: sh ntp associations detail
> Real stab in the dark here,
>
> But doesn't Sane mean you've configured it and it's sync'd up with the
> master and doesn't Insane mean that you've configured the master but
> it's not synced
>
> You don't need to be insane to go for CCIE, but it helps :)
>
> Simon.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> John
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 7:40 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: sh ntp associations detail
>
> The first line reads
>
> 155.1.146.4 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum 2
>
> The only thing I don't get is the "sane" part. I've been looking for
> the
> meaning of "sane" and "insane". Does "insane" indicate a certain type
> of
> error? Or does it mean that something (could be anything) is
configured
> wrong?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:13 ART