From: Jason Guy (jguy) (jguy@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2007 - 11:51:08 ART
That is correct. All the bgp speakers in a confederation need to know
they are a part of the confederated AS.
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Gregory Gombas
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:39 AM
To: Rana Bilal
Cc: SimonG@pcsystems.gr; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP confederation Peer command
Since we're on the subject...the BGP confederation identifier needs to
be configured on all devices in the confederation, correct? Not just
on the border routers, right?
On 10/8/07, Rana Bilal <rab_91@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Simon-
>
> You need that command just on the EBGP peers with in the
confederations,
> also try to peer the sub-AS in the confederations using Physical
interface
> addresses rather than loopback interfaces.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bilal
>
>
> >From: "Grace Simon" <SimonG@pcsystems.gr>
> >Reply-To: "Grace Simon" <SimonG@pcsystems.gr>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: BGP confederation Peer command
> >Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:13:18 +0300
> >
> >SG,
> >
> >
> >
> >Am I correct in my understanding?
> >
> >
> >
> >When you have bgp confederations, the BGP confederation peer 65xxx
> >command is only needed between the routers that are peered between
the
> >two private AS's and that it is NOT needed on all hosts in the two
> >private AS's?
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >Simon.
> >
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Cafi.
Stop by
> today!
>
http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_O
ctHMtagline
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART