From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 08 2007 - 12:23:57 ART
I don't understand why you expect it to be stripped off?
the bidirectional is configured together with sparse mode, the bidirectional
job is like to be the master of a sparse mode domain to control several RP's
by adding a designated forwarder (DF)
On 10/8/07, Jay.Hanke@alltel.com <Jay.Hanke@alltel.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed, but my question is regarding running two RP's on the same router,
> one for Bidirectional and one for Sparse mode. Otherwise, how would the
> routers know to allow upstream traffic for a particular group?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* shiran guez [mailto:shiranp3@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 08, 2007 12:21 AM
> *To:* Hanke, Jay
> *Cc:* ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: Bidir-PIM: Example
>
>
> no, when you set a static RP address you must set it on all the Multicast
> Routers inclde the RP himself.
>
>
>
>
> On 10/7/07, Jay.Hanke@alltel.com <Jay.Hanke@alltel.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the bidir-pim example on this page:
> >
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/himc_c/
> > chap05/mcbbasic.htm#wp1134906
> >
> > The following example is cited with the description saying that group
> > 226/8
> > will be in sparse mode rather than bidirectional mode.
> >
> > !Enable IP multicast routing
> > ip multicast-routing
> > !Enable bidir-PIM
> > ip pim bidir-enable
> > interface loopback 0
> > description One Loopback address for this routers Bidir Mode RP function
> > ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface loopback 1
> > description One Loopback address for this routers Sparse Mode RP
> > function
> > ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
> >
> > ip pim rp-address 10.0.1.1 45 bidir
> > ip pim rp-address 10.0.2.1 46 bidir
> >
> > access-list 45 permit 224.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
> > access-list 45 permit 227.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
> > access-list 46 permit 226.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
> >
> > Shouldn't the ip pim rp-address 10.0.2.1 46 bidir command have the bidir
> > stripped off?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > jay
> >
> >
> > *****************************************************************************
> > *************
> > The information contained in this message, including attachments, may
> > contain
> > privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered
> > only
> > to the
> > person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
> > person
> > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
> > Alltel
> > requests
> > that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the
> >
> > message or its
> > attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to
> > anyone else.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shiran Guez
> MCSE CCNP NCE1
> http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
>
> ******************************************************************************************
> The information contained in this message, including attachments, may contain
> privileged or confidential information that is intended to be delivered only to the
> person identified above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, Alltel requests
> that you immediately notify the sender and asks that you do not read the message or its
> attachments, and that you delete them without copying or sending them to anyone else.
>
>
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART