From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:27:05 ART
Hi Ruth,
You will be doing this in interface mode won't you?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/qos/configuration/guide/qcdgts.html#wp1000916
In which case I imagine the implicit deny any at the end of an ACL will
require the permit.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ruth@mycomputer.co.uk" <rswgreat@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: Traffic Shaping
> Hi
>
> I have the following statement on an interface, I am trying to shape
> everything but voice:-
>
> traffic-shape group 101 7000000 700000 7000000 1000
> and my access-list is as follows:-
>
> access-list 101 deny udp any host
> 200.0.0.4 range 16384 32767
> access-list 101 permit ip any host 200.0.0.4
>
> My
> question is do I need the second line of my ACL? since I am not applying
> the
> ACL to an interface as such, I just don't want to include the voice
> traffic in
> the traffic shaping?
>
> Thanks
> ___________________________________________________________
> Want ideas for
> reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good
> http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART