VLAN base QoS

From: Derek Chan (derekc@mad.scientist.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:13:58 ART

Next message: Rana Bilal: "RE: default multicast pim mode"
Previous message: Darren Johnson: "RE: CCIE binding.. [mx]"
Next in thread: Derek Pocoroba: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Maybe reply: Derek Pocoroba: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Can someone tell me the difference of the following two configurations on
CAT3560:

* Task police the all IP traffic from VLAN 10 to 64 kbps with burst of
2 Kb and drop the exceed packets.
* Vlan 10 is on interface FA0/10 of the CAT 3560.

Configuration 1:

Interface FastEthernet 0/10
Switchport access vlan 10
Switchport mode access
Service-policy input VLAN10-LIMIT
!
Access-list 100 permit ip any any
!
Class-map match-all ALL-TRAFFIC
   Match access-group 100
!
Policy-map VLAN10-LIMIT
   Class ALL-TRAFFIC
      Police 64000 2000 exceed-action drop
!

Configuration 2:

Interface FastEthernet 0/10
Switchport access vlan 10
Switchport mode access
Mls qos vlan-based
Access-list 100 permit ip any any
!
Class-map match-all ALL-TRAFFIC
   Match access-group 100
!
Policy-map VLAN10-LIMIT
   Class ALL-TRAFFIC
      Police 64000 2000 exceed-action drop
!
Interface VLAN 10
No ip address
Service-policy input VLAN10-LIMIT
!

To me, those two configurations do the same job and confirm with the task
requirement. Why would one will use one configure over the other?

Next message: Rana Bilal: "RE: default multicast pim mode"
Previous message: Darren Johnson: "RE: CCIE binding.. [mx]"
Next in thread: Derek Pocoroba: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Maybe reply: Derek Pocoroba: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "Re: VLAN base QoS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART