From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2007 - 23:33:17 ART
I'm assuming that we are talking about something in the R&S exam, so I'd
think the two solutions listed there are the most likely ones! Yeah, there
are others for real life, but highly unlikely in the R&S lab!
Embrace the things you don't need to know. :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joseph Brunner
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:32 PM
To: 'Eric Dobyns'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Tricky Layer 2 Question
L2tpv3 (xconnect commands) or bridge-group (bridge irb) can do this.
We used to bridge some non-routeable stuff.
I'm sure the SP IE's here have 10 more ways to do it (pseudowires, atom,
gmpls)... gents?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Eric
Dobyns
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Tricky Layer 2 Question
Two devices speaking to one another via a non-routable protocol. One of the
devices has to be moved across a frame connection from the other.
How would I go about allowing the two devices to speak at L2 across a wan
link? I had thought about using NAT or proxy-arp, but if it is a
non-routeable protocol, they may be talking MAC address to MAC address.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART