From: Mohamed M Moustafa (mmma@gawab.com)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2007 - 03:34:10 ART
Hi Brian,
Thank you very much for your response, but do i have to insure full
reachability even for example for routes received from the BB routers, and
prevent all kind of routing loops, even if i am not asked to, what is scope
of full reahability.
BR,
Mohammed Mahmoud.
Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote on 2 Oct 2007, 08:12
AM:
Subject: Re: Mutual redistribution and loop prevention
Do whatever you need to ensure full reachability. If a routing loop is
causing you to not have full reachability then resolve it.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Mohamed M Moustafa wrote:
Hi everybody,
I heard a lot about over thinking tasks in the exam, and i've a small
question to know if i am over thinking this issue or not, it is regarding
mutual redistribution and loop prevention.
Lets assume that i was asked to do a lot of mutual redistributions, which
eventually will cause routing loops, and after wards i was asked to prevent
certain routing loops at certain points in the network, does this mean that
i don't have to prevent all routing loops at all points in the network,
just the loops i was asked to prevent, or do i have to prevent all routing
loops in the topology, which is sometimes cumbersome.
BR,
Mohammed Mahmoud.
---------------------------------------------
Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com
Sign up NOW and get your account @gawab.com!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:11 ART