From: Meried Bekele (meriedbekele@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2007 - 14:10:39 ART
Me too. Words like 'allocate' and 'reserve' may better go with queueing than
policing. So I would also go for CBWFQ.
Best Regards,
On 9/30/07, Rich Collins <nilsi2002@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If it said "allocate" and not limit I would say the first and then
> 'bandwidth' and not police.
>
> On 9/29/07, raul raul <juvenn@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > depend on Q;
> >
> > if they say dont use Car the the first 1
> > if use car then the 2nd > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:19:33 +0530> From:
> > slevin.kremera@gmail.com> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject:
> > rate-limiting> > r2 fa0/0 is connected to bb1 and bb2 on a sub-intf> >
> > question says allocate 10 mbps traffic on fa0/0 for traffic coming from
> bb2>
> > and bb3> > which solution is correct> > class-map> match input int
> fa0/0>
> > policy-map> police 10mb> > or> > int fa0/0> rate-limit 10mb> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________>
> > Subscription information may be found at: >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Personalize your Live.com homepage with the news, weather, and photos
> you
> > care about.
> > http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx?icid=T001MSN30A0701
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Meried B. Network Operations Senior Expert National Data Center (PMO) Mob. +251 91 1349519
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:17 ART