From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2007 - 12:21:32 ART
Guys
Can we knock all this off please? It's getting really bloody tedius.
TIA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darby Weaver" <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
To: "Darby Weaver" <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>; "Narbik Kocharians"
<narbikk@gmail.com>
Cc: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>; "Victor Cappuccio"
<vcappuccio@gmail.com>; <Jay.Hanke@alltel.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: NLI R&S volume 7 Lab 3
> All and Narbik,
>
> For the record, I have reviewed the email chain and
> had a chance to review it in the daylight hours.
>
> 1. Narbik - you are wrong - the email where you
> "jokingly - I hope" mentioned buying copyright
> materials (NLI specifically) and giving them away was
> published to GS by you and not by me. It is in this
> email where you mentioned not getting paid by NLI for
> workbooks, etc. and then changed your story and blamed
> me for publishing the email to GS. Please review your
> sent emails. I did review mine. This is a very
> serious statement and one which I do not condone. In
> the same email you mentioned for the second time about
> your class in Las Vegas and also told Victor you would
> check with FastLane about the CCSI thing.
>
> 2. I asked questions based on the information given -
> Sorry, it's what I do if something seems not quite
> right. Brad wrote me and asked me to stay out of it,
> since each person's situation was and is different. I
> was concerned since I did recommend Victor to consider
> employment initially with Brad and NLI. But again,
> the questions have been raised and I understand their
> is now a dialog occurring in private where it should
> be.
>
> 3. I do not appreciate Narbik implying that I
> published his private emails that were unicast - I did
> not and wish the record to be clear on the matter. As
> far as I can tell Victor did not either. It looks to
> be a simple mistake where Narbik, himself, replied to
> all - and ccielab@groupstudy happened to be on the
> recipient list. A simple misunderstanding. I did not
> write those words and do not wish to take credit for
> someone even implying buying a vendor's works and then
> publishing them publicly and for spite or revenge.
> This is not my character and I am not happy that
> Narbik thinks I would have deliberately published or
> replied to this line of reasoning.
>
> 4. For the record, Victor, the author of his own
> works, may or may not choose, to introduce those works
> to the public domain, however, I think he has been
> very careful to ensure he does not confuse what is
> copyright and what is not. Look carefully.
>
> 5. I do think a lot of people's character came out of
> this and if one really cares one would follow-up. And
> by the way, for Brad's part, he did respond
> professionally at least to me unicast, I would think
> he has done the same to the other parties of this
> email.
>
> 6. Finger-pointing is not a skill required for the
> CCIE Lab. We are all adults and one should never say
> in email anything that is not to be repeated. We
> should also be careful whatever we write in email,
> especially with such statements that can be quite
> badly sent and received.
>
> 7. Sorry to all bystanders for this public display -
> however, given I felt like I was becoming a scapegoat
> by a known and reputable CCIE Trainer for making
> copyright materials public - I felt I should clear the
> air and be very clear, that I did agree with Victor,
> that any materials created by Victor, and NOT paid for
> or owned by anyone else could be made public domain
> and thus invalidate their future sale value, IF Victor
> felt he needed to go that route. I also think it was
> in poor taste for a notable instructor, a creator of
> notable copyright materials, to even make such a
> statement in private or even if joking. However, the
> statement was made and not by myself or Victor.
>
> 8. As near as I can tell, NLI had not published for
> sale any labs so far that were unpaid for as of yet by
> Victor.
>
> 9. I think that wraps it up for my part. Trust me, I
> do not like my words to ever be confused for what I
> did and did not say.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:17 ART