From: Derek Pocoroba (dpocoroba@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2007 - 20:37:11 ART
Jo,
Sometimes order of operations can be important with these Cisco
dynamic/"magic" mappings. I have run into problems where things should have
worked but didn't. A good "wr mem" and reload seemed to usually fix these
problems.
HTH
On 9/28/07, Jo Knight <joknight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am just starting out going through the IEWB 4.1 Volume I for Frame
> Relay tasks. I am trying to get Inverse ARP to work, but cannot for the
> life of me get it going on my rack. The setup is very simple. R1, R4 and
> R5 are configured as follows:
>
> R1
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
>
> R4
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.4 255.0.0.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 405
>
>
> R5
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.5 255.0.0.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no frame-relay inverse-arp IP 504
>
>
> When I do a show frame-relay map on any of the routers I see no dynamic
> entries and I cannot ping between R1 and R4 or R1 and R5, even though
> the PVC are active on all devices.
>
> R1
> DLCI = 104, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/0
> DLCI = 105, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0/0
>
>
> I decided to go back to the Volume I task, as I was having major trouble
> on IEWB 4.1 Lab 2 setting up a fully meshed frame-relay network using
> Inverse ARP - no matter what i did I got no dynamic entries from the
> frame-relay map command.
>
> Please help as I am missing something simple here...
>
> Thanks,
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Derek Pocoroba CCIE #18559
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART