Re: Bridging over FR

From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:55:59 ART


I did all the out put you see is also using a Dynamips, my question is not
how but why if someone have a logical or formal explanation to it I will
appreciate it.

as I do not see the logic why it happen that way.

On 9/28/07, Ben <bmunyao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Shiran,
>
> I used the capture feature on dynamips to analyze the frames sent. As
> Hadek stated, without bridging, the frames included only one L2 header
>
> FR hdr - IP hdr - payload (icmp in my case) |
>
>
> When i changed over to bridging with IP on BVIs, the frames now had two
> L2 headers as follows:
>
> FR hdr - Eth Hdr - IP hdr - payload
>
> Get Wireshark and try it out.
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
> On 9/28/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > the only difference between LAN to FR is the LAN is a Broadcast Domain
> > and FR is NBMA non broadcast domain and when you are using a NBMA you need
> > to do resolve of Layer 3 to 2 but when working with Point To Point you do
> > not need to resolve Layer 3 to 2 so the only diff is that you do not support
> > broadcast.
> >
> > so I do not think this is a valid explanation bridging is not expecting
> > IP bridging is layer 2 and is independent from layer 3.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/28/07, hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com < hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I thinks the explanation is that your hub router is expecting
> > > IPoLANoFR
> > > packets, not IPoFR . Hence, you have to enable Bridging in spokes
> > > routers
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > ext shiran guez
> > > Sent: vendredi 28 septembre 2007 12:33
> > > To: Ben
> > > Cc: Cisco certification
> > > Subject: Re: Bridging over FR
> > >
> > > Thanks Ben, but what is the explanation to this?
> > >
> > > as i see it when I bridge the 2 interface together why do i need to
> > > include also the other side of the serial link on the bridging in
> > > Broadcast Domain like Ethernet I do not need to do it so why in NBMA
> > > with Point to Point as it should not have a problem with Layer 3 to 2
> > > resolution.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/28/07, Ben <bmunyao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Shiran,
> > > >
> > > > You need to use "bridge irb" on R2/R3, and move the IP addresses
> > > from
> > > > the serial interfaces to BVIs. That way, and with "bridge-group ..."
> > > > on the serial interface, it will work.
> > > >
> > > > HTH
> > > >
> > > > Ben
> > > >
> > > > On 9/28/07, shiran guez < shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > R3-------
> > > > > |-----R1
> > > > > R2-------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R1 is used as FR Hub for R2 and R3
> > > > > I am trying to set R1 as Bridge between R2 and R3 I used R1 /2/3
> > > > > Point to Point Interface
> > > > >
> > > > > R1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > !
> > > > > interface Serial1/0
> > > > > no ip address
> > > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > > no ip route-cache
> > > > > serial restart-delay 0
> > > > > !
> > > > > interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point no ip route-cache frame-relay
> > > > > interface-dlci 102 bridge-group 1 !
> > > > > interface Serial1/0.2 point-to-point no ip route-cache frame-relay
> > >
> > > > > interface-dlci 103 bridge-group 1 no ip routing bridge 1 protocol
> > > > > ieee end
> > > > >
> > > > > R1#sh bridge 1 group
> > > > >
> > > > > Bridge Group 1 is running the IEEE compatible Spanning Tree
> > > protocol
> > > > >
> > > > > Port 12 (Serial1/0.1 Frame Relay) of bridge group 1 is
> > > forwarding
> > > > > Port 13 (Serial1/0.2 Frame Relay) of bridge group 1 is
> > > forwarding
> > > > >
> > > > > R1#sh spanning-tree 1 brief
> > > > >
> > > > > Bridge group 1
> > > > > Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
> > > > > Root ID Priority 32768
> > > > > Address 0000.0c45.dae8
> > > > > This bridge is the root
> > > > > Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15
> > > sec
> > > > >
> > > > > Bridge ID Priority 32768
> > > > > Address 0000.0c45.dae8
> > > > > Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15
> > > sec
> > > > > Aging Time 300
> > > > >
> > > > > Interface Designated
> > > > > Name Port ID Prio Cost Sts Cost Bridge
> > > > > ID Port
> > > > > ID
> > > > > -------------------- ------- ---- ----- --- -----
> > > --------------------
> > > > > -------
> > > > > Serial1/0.1 128.12 128 647 FWD 0 32768
> > > 0000.0c45.dae8
> > > > > 128.12
> > > > > Serial1/0.2 128.13 128 647 FWD 0 32768
> > > 0000.0c45.dae8
> > > > > 128.13
> > > > >
> > > > > R2
> > > > >
> > > > > R2#sh run int ser1/0.1
> > > > > Building configuration...
> > > > >
> > > > > Current configuration : 119 bytes
> > > > > !
> > > > > interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
> > > > > ip address 182.158.123.2 255.255.255.0
> > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 201
> > > > >
> > > > > R3
> > > > >
> > > > > R3#sh run int ser1/0.1
> > > > > Building configuration...
> > > > >
> > > > > Current configuration : 119 bytes
> > > > > !
> > > > > interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
> > > > > ip address 182.158.123.3 255.255.255.0
> > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 301
> > > > >
> > > > > but I do not understand why i cant ping between R2 to R3 as it
> > > look
> > > like
> > > > > the
> > > > > bridge is FWD and working ok all the interface are point to point
> > > so
> > > > > there
> > > > > should not be a encapsulation error of resolving layer 2 to 3 or
> > > layer 2
> > > > > to
> > > > > 2 on the bridge
> > > > >
> > > > > R2#debug ip packet detail
> > > > > IP packet debugging is on (detailed)
> > > > > R2#ping 182.158.123.3 re 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > > > Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 182.158.123.3 , timeout is 2
> > > seconds:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36: 11.215: IP: tableid=0, s=182.158.123.2 (local), d=
> > > > > 182.158.123.3 (Serial1/0.1), routed via FIB
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36:11.219: IP: s= 182.158.123.2 (local),
> > > > > d=182.158.123.3(Serial1/0.1), len 100, sending
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36:11.219: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> > > > > Success rate is 0 percent (0/1)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R3#debug ip packet detail
> > > > > IP packet debugging is on (detailed)
> > > > > R3#ping 182.158.123.2 re 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > > > Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 182.158.123.2, timeout is 2
> > > seconds:
> > > > >
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36: 57.651: IP: tableid=0, s=182.158.123.3 (local), d=
> > > > > 182.158.123.2 (Serial1/0.1), routed via FIB
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36:57.655: IP: s= 182.158.123.3 (local),
> > > > > d=182.158.123.2(Serial1/0.1), len 100, sending
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:36:57.655: ICMP type=8, code=0.
> > > > > Success rate is 0 percent (0/1)
> > > > >
> > > > > so you see there is no problem sending on both sides
> > > > >
> > > > > also I am getting on the DLCI 0x4242 Spaning tree frames
> > > > >
> > > > > R3#debug frame-relay packet
> > > > > Frame Relay packet debugging is on
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:40:34.571: Serial1/0(i): dlci 301(0x48D1), pkt type
> > > 0x4242,
> > > > > datagramsize 39
> > > > > R3#
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:40:40.575: Serial1/0(i): dlci 301(0x48D1), pkt type
> > > 0x4242,
> > > > > datagramsize 39
> > > > > R3#
> > > > > *Mar 1 00:40:42.571 : Serial1/0(i): dlci 301(0x48D1), pkt type
> > > 0x4242,
> > > > > datagramsize 39
> > > > > R3#
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am missing here something stupid for sure
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Shiran Guez
> > > > > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > > > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shiran Guez
> > > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shiran Guez
> > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> >
>
>

-- 
Shiran Guez
MCSE CCNP NCE1
http://cciep3.blogspot.com


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART