From: Rich Collins (nilsi2002@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2007 - 11:46:55 ART
Okay I see what you mean.
Yes that would work but generally you are not allowed to add static routes
unless the question specifically hints at it.
On 9/27/07, Andrey Slastenov <a.slastenov@ciscoman.ru> wrote:
>
> But I have no 132.X.X.X networks in my BGP process, because i don't put
> any subnets of this network into BGP process. (If you look at previous
> tasks, we don't include any 132.X.X.X into BGP process).
>
> Rich Collins wrote:
> > No because AS254 will see not only this summary address but also the
> > more specific networks and you aren't allowed any access list or
> > prefix list filtering in the direction of AS254.
> >
> > On 9/27/07, *Andrey Slastenov* <a.slastenov@ciscoman.ru
> > <mailto:a.slastenov@ciscoman.ru>> wrote:
> >
> > How do you think can i use
> > network 132.1.0.0 <http://132.1.0.0> 255.255.0.0 <http://255.255.0.0
> >
> > with
> > ip route 132.1.0.0 <http://132.1.0.0> 255.255.0.0
> > <http://255.255.0.0> Null0
> >
> > and ip prefix-list for R3 and R4 neighbors.
> >
> > Is this alternative solution?
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART