From: subodh.rawat@wipro.com
Date: Wed Sep 26 2007 - 07:04:14 ART
This is something promising. Absolutely, "CCIE Lab only" command ...LOL
________________________________
From: Mounir Mohamed [mailto:mounir.mohamed@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 3:05 PM
To: Subodh Singh Rawat (WT01 - TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDER)
Cc: shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: question on Channel-protocol configuration
One more hint, the channel-protocol command only need to restrict the
protocol that can be used on the interface.
On 9/26/07, Mounir Mohamed <mounir.mohamed@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, by configured the mode the switch will undestand which
protocol you enabled on so no need to specify the channel-protocol on.
interface FastEthernet0/13
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode desirable
end
Rack1SW1#show run int f0/14
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 127 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/14
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode desirable
end
Rack1SW1#show run int f0/15
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 127 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/15
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode desirable
end
Rack1SW1#show ether pro
Channel-group listing:
----------------------
Group: 1
----------
Protocol: PAgP
On 9/26/07, subodh.rawat@wipro.com < subodh.rawat@wipro.com
<mailto:subodh.rawat@wipro.com> > wrote:
So, is it really required to give "channel-protocol
pagp" when we are
giving "channel-group 1 mode desirable" at both the
ends? Because,
desirable-desirable will in any case result in PAGP.
Subodh
-----Original Message-----
From: Shine Joseph [mailto: shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au
<mailto:shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au> ]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Subodh Singh Rawat (WT01 - TELECOM SERVICE
PROVIDER);
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: question on Channel-protocol configuration
Subodh,
The first one is a valid configuration.
The second configuration is not valid and the switch
would reject the
command when you try to configure. Please see below the
error message.
SW2(config-if)#channel-protocol pagp
SW2(config-if)#
02:09:08: %EC-5-ERRPROT2: Command rejected: the
interface Fa0/14 is
already part of a channel with a different type of
protocol enabled
HTH,
Shine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:
nobody@groupstudy.com <mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> ] On Behalf Of
subodh.rawat@wipro.com
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 2:32 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: question on Channel-protocol configuration
Hi Group,
Please let me know what is the result of below
configurations:
interface FastEthernet0/20
no switchport
no ip address
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode desirable
AND
interface FastEthernet0/20
no switchport
no ip address
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode active
Assuming other end in the configuration is
"channel-group 1 mode
desirable" and "channel-group 1 mode passive"
respectively.
Subodh
The information contained in this electronic message and
any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of
the addressee(s)
and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should not
disseminate,
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately and
destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email.
The recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus
transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com <http://www.wipro.com/>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART