From: Han Solo (hansolo@ccieunix.com)
Date: Sun Sep 23 2007 - 18:34:03 ART
Thanks Narbik , I thought that was the case , but I have a scenario I am
doing in which it is not. I have verified that for sure the router say R1
has both routes and if I pull bgp out , then eigrp takes over and vise
versa. So I think there is some other decision process involved there ,
this is what I am trying to figure you. As I have the backdoor route
tagged , but yet the Higher AD bgp route overrides the 170 eigrp route.
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Narbik Kocharians wrote:
> Correct.
>
> On 9/23/07, Han Solo <hansolo@ccieunix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi can you clarify if I am thinking right about this. If you have a router
>> that is learning a given prefix by D EX so external eigrp. Then this same
>> router is learning this same prefix via ebgp hence 20 , so now this router
>> knows about the same prefix , lets call it A . Via both eigrp and bgp , if
>> I want this router to route to prefix A , via eigrp can't you use the
>> following under bgp routing process " network A mask 255.0.0.0 backdoor"
>> so now the AD of ebgp default 20 is now 200 , so that now the eigrp ex 170
>> takes over ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:15 ART