From: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta (Ryan.Wilson@relayhealth.com)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2007 - 23:42:30 ART
Agreed,
But for the lab, I was thinking there might be a general best approach
to redistribution in 3 point scenarios with redundancy.
Ryan Wilson
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Brunner [mailto:joe@affirmedsystems.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 9:41 PM
To: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: General Redistribution Question
This advice appears Wendell Odom's CCIE exam certification guide.
There is a whole chapter on detailed redistribution. I am fairly
confident
if Wendell Odom sat the lab today, he would pass.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 9:29 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: General Redistribution Question
I'm working through IEWB RS Vol2 LAB 2 and had a general question about
what's the best approach for two way redistribution.
To tag or not to tag? I'm thinking distance is best if there's two
two-way redistribution points and you need redundancy. If you have three
two-way redistribution points, maybe going with tagging or a combination
of tagging and distance is best. Or maybe not. I guess I'm looking for a
hard rule of thumb for certain situations.
Thanks,
Ryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:15 ART