Re: the value of tags

From: Joe Dewberry (jdewberr@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed Sep 19 2007 - 12:11:05 ART


Hey Scott,

I built for myself a simple mnemonic to remember

deny target
deny target & source
deny other & source
permit other --> add source
permit source --> set tag of source

my biggest fear is running into a nasty multiprotocol redistribution
scheme and having something be missed. I spent a while thinking about
this tagging scheme and scenarios where it would not work..couldn't
think of any yet.

--
Joe

>At 11:07 2007.09.19 Scott Morris wrote: > You can scale the tags as much or as little as you want. It's simply an > exercise in logic (and typing!). :) > > Whether you have multiple points of redistribution to the same routing > protocol and wanto to use the same tag or different tags is up to you. > > You may have 100 = RIP, 200 = OSPF as an example. In a larger concept, you > could have tag 101 = RIP from R1, 102 = RIP from R2, 204 = OSPF from R4, > etc. > > The goal of it all is a simpler/scalable way to pick exactly what goes where > and watching to be sure you don't have loops. > > Sometimes it'll make your head hurt, but should scale just fine. > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M > #153, CISSP, et al. > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor > > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! > > smorris@ipexpert.com > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > http://www.ipexpert.com > > > -----Original Message-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:13 ART