From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 18 2007 - 01:57:25 ART
thanks for the clerfication, i will go over it again.
On 9/18/07, Ash <nester2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think he said that you can't redistribute 3 protocols on one
> router. the condition is that if rip goes into ospf and ospf goes into eigrp
> doesn't mean that rip routes through the virtue of rip to ospf will
> automatically get redistribiuted into eigrp as well. therefore rip will have
> to be redistributed into eigrp separately.
>
> regards,
>
> On 9/17/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am asking this question as in task 1.3 they already contradict the
> > restrictions so may be my solution is also valid for task 4.7,
> >
> > it would be helpful if Brian could comment on that.
> >
> > also in task 4.10 it is indicated to do a redistribution on one router
> > between 3 protocol rip ospf and eigrp and on the RS Advanced technology
> > COD
> > in the Redistribution part in week one Brian Dennis indicate that it is
> > not
> > possible to do redistribution of 3 routing protocol one to another all
> > on
> > one router, so this is another confusing issue with lab 20.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/17/07, Greg Wendel <gwendel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Shiran,
> > > I looked at the lab. It says,
> > > "Do not use any static routes, default routes, default networks, or
> > policy
> > > routing unless otherwise specified."
> > >
> > > I don't want to review the solution guide since I haven't started this
> > lab
> > > yet, but your answer would definitely not get any points so I wouldn't
> > use
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Greg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/17/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have done:
> > > >
> > > > !R5
> > > > !
> > > > ip local policy route-map SW2->VLAN34
> > > > !
> > > > !
> > > > !
> > > > ip access-list standard VLAN34
> > > > permit 142.1.34.0 0.0.0.255
> > > > !
> > > > !
> > > > route-map SW2->VLAN34 permit 10
> > > > match ip address VLAN34
> > > > set ip next-hop 142.1.0.4
> > > >
> > > > it is a working solution but the question is it accepted solution as
> > I
> > > > do
> > > > not think I defined an restriction but it is not as the Solution
> > Guid
> > > > solve
> > > > this
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Shiran Guez
> > > > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gregory Wendel
> > > Springfield VA, 22153
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shiran Guez
> > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:12 ART