From: Farrukh Haroon (farrukhharoon@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2007 - 06:58:12 ART
Hello
If you want to monitor traffic for VLAN 100 on both switches then definitely
(1) is the correct solution.
Regards
Farrukh
On 9/17/07, Akaradeth N@MS@DCTH-BKK <Akaradeth.N@datacraft-asia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> I have question about remote span, which configuration is a correct one,
> (1) or (2)
>
>
>
> SW1 vlan 100, remote span vlan 999
>
> SW2 vlan 100, remote span vlan 999, IPS on port fa0/10
>
>
>
> (1)
>
> Sw1#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
>
> Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999 reflect fa0/19
>
>
>
> Sw2#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 , 999 rx
>
> Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> (2)
>
> Sw1#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
>
> Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999 reflect fa0/19
>
>
>
> Sw2#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100
>
> Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
>
>
>
> Monitor session 2 source remote vlan 999
>
> Monitor session 2 destination int fa0/10
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank in advance
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Akaradeth
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
>
> http://www.datacraft-asia.com/disclaimer
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:12 ART