Re: rip neighbors problem

From: Adham Ali (adhamccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:11:13 ART

• Next message: Alex Burba: "Re: Test - Please Ignore"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Fwd: bgp reg-exp for directly connected costumers"
• Maybe in reply to: Max Braun: "rip neighbors problem"
• Next in thread: Max Braun: "Re: rip neighbors problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Max,
   
  Did u try to play with the distance command?...
   
  Example:
   
  -router) distance 121 <R4> 0.0.0.0 <ACL>

  and the ACL match the networks you want!
   
  Regards,
  Adham!
Marc La Porte <marc.a.laporte@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi Max,
   
  I would appreciate a more detailed example, but can you also tell why you cannot amend the next hop with a route-map?
  I am intrigued with your statement though
   
  Thanks
  Marc

 
  On 9/13/07, Max Braun <r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote: Hi, Guys!

When I began this research, I thought that I was mistake in something.
But now I know that with my topology I can't change my next hop. R3 see
the update from R4, but R4 give the address of R10, and because they on
the same Ethernet segment - R3 always send packets directly to R10.

It can not be changed any local or traffic policing.

Thank you all!

Best regards,
Max Braun

--
We've Got Your Name @ www.mail.com!!!
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains

• Next message: Alex Burba: "Re: Test - Please Ignore"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Fwd: bgp reg-exp for directly connected costumers"
• Maybe in reply to: Max Braun: "rip neighbors problem"
• Next in thread: Max Braun: "Re: rip neighbors problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:11 ART