From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2007 - 06:15:49 ART
I think you have confusion with the whole concept of RIP, rip is not sending
direct update to any one, also there is no neighbor concept in RIP.
RIP is sending either Broadcast on ver 1 or Multicast on ver 2 full topology
updates.
On 9/13/07, Max Braun <r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote:
>
> Give me the right config ;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Lui"
> To: "Max Braun"
> Subject: Re: rip neighbors problem
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:15:45 -0700
>
> Hi Max,
>
> That is not true. The next hop can be changed on R3 from R10 to R4.
>
> Ed
>
> On 9/12/07, Max Braun < r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Guys!
>
> When I began this research, I thought that I was mistake in
> something. But now I know that with my topology I can't change my
> next hop. R3 see the update from R4, but R4 give the address of
> R10, and because they on the same Ethernet segment - R3 always
> send packets directly to R10.
>
> It can not be changed any local or traffic policing.
>
> Thank you all!
>
> Best regards,
> Max Braun
>
>
> -- We've Got Your Name @ Mail.com !!!
> Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Max Braun
>
> --
> We've Got Your Name @ www.mail.com!!!
> Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:11 ART