RE: All numbers are beutiful ...but below 7000 have something

From: Seonghui (Seonghui@vads.com)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 23:56:01 ART


I prefer the 2-day lab as well (even though I sat and passed the 1 day
lab)

If you were in Cisco's shoe, instead of taking 1day to test 1 CCIE
candidate, now you need 2 days, their 'revenue' from the lab exam will
be reduced by half...

Don't forget it's USD1350 per exam X number of seats X number of center
worldwide X number of days in a year open for testing

If my calculation is correct, it's at least a USD20mil business (1 day
lab)...

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
darth router
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:23 AM
To: shiran guez
Cc: subodh.rawat@wipro.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: All numbers are beutiful ...but below 7000 have something
special

I would rather have a two day CCIE number. The two day lab is definitely
harder. It is 2 days! Despite your know how and ability to pass day one
you
could get tripped up by something stupid, like a gum wrapper wrapped
around
a a cable contact. Cisco ditched the two day format because they felt if
you
could build the lab, you should be able to troubleshoot it as well. On
top
of that, do any of you think you could pass the lab reading merely cisco
press books? There were not many vendor workbooks back in those days;
thus
much much harder to learn the relavant info, thus less people passing
the
lab, and thus a much more difficult overall endeavor. I would love for
cisco
to bring back the two day lab. That would solve the problem of cheaters
and
braindumpers. There is no way a braindumper would be able to
troubleshoot
that rack on day 2 :) Bring it back Cisco!!

DR

On 9/12/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> According to your theory that it is easier because there are more
> information, either people are stupid or lazy.
>
> and I think you should try before stating such theory, and after you
try
> tell us your experience.
>
>
>
> On 9/12/07, subodh.rawat@wipro.com <subodh.rawat@wipro.com> wrote:
> >
> > Though I am preparing for CCIE and think that achiving CCIE is
something
> > a great achievment. But I think that numbers below 7000 or 8000 for
that
> > matter are more than beautiful. They are hard earned numbers.
Getting
> > number these days is fairly easy than before, may be bacause
vendor's
> > workbooks are very close to real lab.
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> >
> > Subodh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments
> > to
> > this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and
> > may
> > contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you
are
> > not
> > the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy
> > this
> > e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies
of
> > this
> > message and any attachments.
> >
> > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The
recipient
> > should
> > check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The
> > company
> > accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by
> > this
> > email.
> >
> > www.wipro.com
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:11 ART