From: Swan, Jay (jswan@sugf.com)
Date: Tue Sep 11 2007 - 15:53:43 ART
Nice! I am not a consultant, and we typically buy IP Services anyway, so
I hadn't noticed this.
In any event, I was recently called a "mad scientist" by an engineer at
our reseller because all of my recent designs route to the access layer.
I think it should be the default design, but most people seem somewhat
surprised by it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edison Ortiz [mailto:edisonmortiz@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:38 PM
To: Swan, Jay; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VTP Server redundancy ?
EIGRP stub routing is also provided.
Edison Ortiz
Routing and Switching, CCIE # 17943
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Swan, Jay
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:41 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VTP Server redundancy ?
One problem I see with routing to the access layer is the premium price
that
Cisco charges for the IP Services image on the 3560 and 3750 switches.
If
you don't buy it, you're stuck with static routing, RIP, or trunking.
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joseph Brunner
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:39 AM
To: 'Tony Blanco'; thomas.rader@freesurf.ch; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VTP Server redundancy ?
Actually you shouldn't design networks that need vlans switched all over
the
place anymore... it's just a bad design. I can tell you first hand all
the
problems I have seen as a consultant these last 2 years fixing messes
almost
daily.
The best designed network has no trunks; If a company buys layer 2
switches,
the trunks should minimize the number of vlans allowed on the trunks,
and
even then I can't see using more than 2 or 3 vlans per switch. Its 2007
already, we have 3560G's and 3750's like water.
(I can't wait for the CCDE)
Joe,
Senior CCDP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tony
Blanco
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:31 PM
To: thomas.rader@freesurf.ch; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VTP Server redundancy ?
Have multiples VTP servers on your netwok...and get used to make changes
from one......but you can make changes from any one .... remember that
all
your vtp configuration has to be exactly the same....
blancoj17
----- Original Message ----
From: "thomas.rader@freesurf.ch" <thomas.rader@freesurf.ch>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:38:45 AM
Subject: VTP Server redundancy ?
I'm hoping someone can help me with VTP Server redundancy.
Is it was simple as having two VTP servers in a VTP domain, or am I
missing
something ?
Thanks
Thomas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART